1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 114 F.Supp.
  5. 114 F.Supp. 72 (1953)
 

ALLEN v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

Civil Action No. 970.

114 F.Supp. 72 (1953)

ALLEN et al. v. SOUTHERN RY. CO. et al.

United States District Court W. D. North Carolina.

Decided August 15, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whiteford S. Blakeney and Pierce & Blakeney, Charlotte, N. C., and W. S. Macgill, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

John M. Robinson, Charlotte, N. C., W. T. Joyner, Raleigh, N. C., for defendant Southern Ry. Co.

J. B. Craighill, Charlotte, N. C. (Tillett, Campbell, Craighill & Rendleman, Charlotte, N. C.), Lester P. Schoene and Milton Kramer, Washington, D. C. (Schoene & Kramer, Washington, D. C.), Clarence M. Mulholland, Toledo, Ohio, and Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Washington, D. C. (Mulholland, Robie & Hickey, Toledo, Ohio) for Union defendants.

Before PARKER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and WARLICK, District Judge.

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit instituted in the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, by non-union employees of the Southern Railway Company to enjoin the enforcement against them of a union-shop contract made between that company and a number of labor unions, which required that employees join the union and pay dues or be dismissed from their positions. The railway company and these unions have been made defendants. The plaintiffs make no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases