FRANK v. DOMINICK

Docket No. 19270.

122 Cal.App.2d 45 (1953)

264 P.2d 161

CONRAD FRANK, Appellant, v. JACK DOMINICK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

December 15, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCarroll & McCarroll and Mary H. McCarroll for Appellant.

Arthur V. Kaufman, Fleming, Robbins & Tinsman, C.S. Tinsman and Clay Robbins for Respondent.


VALLEE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action for damages for breach of an agreement of partnership, and for rescission of an agreement dissolving the partnership on the grounds of fraud and mistake. The court found there was no breach of the agreement, and no fraud or mistake.

The evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom will be stated in the light most favorable to defendant-respondent, disregarding conflicting evidence and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases