1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 69 So.2d
  5. 69 So.2d 88 (1953)
 

GODCHAUX SUGARS v. BOLOTTE

Nos. 3774-3775.

69 So.2d 88 (1953)

GODCHAUX SUGARS, Inc. v. BOLOTTE et al. MILLIKEN & FARWELL, Inc. v. BROWN. SOUTHDOWN SUGARS v. BROOKS et al. In re BOLOTTE et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

December 10, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dodd, Hirsch & Barker, New Orleans, for applicant.

Milling, Saal, Sanders, Benson & Woodward, New Orleans, Talbot, LeSueur & Talbot, Napoleonville, Deramee & Deramee, Thibodaux, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants have filed an application for a rehearing in this cause recalling the rule nisi and dismissing the application for a writ of mandamus and prohibition, and attached to their application is a copy of the decision of the Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.

We dismissed the application because we considered that we did not have jurisdiction of the matter because it was a summary proceeding instituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases