1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 28 N.J.
  5. 28 N.J. Super. 119 (1953)
 

LAURINO v. LAURINO

28 N.J. Super. 119 (1953)

100 A.2d 301

MARIA FELICIA LAURINO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS MARY F. LAURINO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ENRICO LAURINO, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS EDWARD LAURINO, DOMINICK E. LAURINO AND MARCELLA LAURINO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Maurice A. Potter argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Potter & Fisher, attorneys).

Mr. John Warren, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The plaintiff Maria Felicia Laurino and the defendant Enrico Laurino were married on November 15, 1917 and lived and toiled together until June 1949. They reared seven children. They acquired as tenants by the entirety a home in Oceanport, a farm of 60 acres, and a parcel of land of five acres, both in Shrewsbury. They derived their livelihood from the sale of the products of the farm. In the latter years they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases