1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 112 F.Supp.
  5. 112 F.Supp. 35 (1953)
 

FUL-VUE SALES CO. v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CO.

112 F.Supp. 35 (1953)

FUL-VUE SALES CO. v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CO.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 29, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, New York City (Daniel V. Mahoney, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City (Alexander C. Neave, New York City, Hector M. Holmes and William W. Rymer, Boston, Mass., of counsel), for defendant.

CLANCY, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff, a partnership, is the owner of the patent in suit No. 2,041,638 granted to it May 19, 1936, as assignee of Ernest E. Emons. The patent is for a spectacle frame or mounting in which the temples are secured to end pieces arranged above the normal field of side vision, the lenses are connected by a bridge member which is substantially in line with the temple connections, and nose guards are arranged on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases