We find no reversible error in the court's rulings with respect to the cross-examination by the plaintiff's attorney of the physician called as a witness by the defendant. The fact that the defendant was insured was blurted out by the defendant himself and was not brought out by the plaintiff's attorney. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a back injury as a result of an automobile collision. The proof as to the exact nature of the injury was unsatisfactory. In the circumstances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
