1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 28 N.J.
  5. 28 N.J. Super. 100 (1953)
 

OVERBY v. UNION LAUNDRY CO.

28 N.J. Super. 100 (1953)

100 A.2d 205

LOUISE OVERBY AND JOHN A. OVERBY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. UNION LAUNDRY COMPANY, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 28, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edmund J. Canzona argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas Francis Doyle argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Townsend & Doyle, attorneys; Mr. Mark Townsend, of counsel; Mr. Frederick J. Fox, on the brief).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The mishap in consequence of which this action was instituted occurred in the building of the Union Laundry Company at the corner of Patterson Avenue and Broad Street in the Borough of Shrewsbury on the early afternoon of July 26, 1952. The plaintiff, Louise Overby, sought to recover from the company compensatory damages for the bodily injuries she sustained in the mishap. Her husband, John A. Overby, sued

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases