The action is laid in slander. The statement alleged to have been made about plaintiff is "Rose took an extra pay envelope". Referring to this statement is the pleaded innuendo that defendant-appellant "thereby intending to charge plaintiff with having stolen [it]". The rule is very well settled. Innuendo may not do the service in a pleading of enlarging the plain meaning of words. (Stevens v. Whalen, 234 App. Div. 118, 119.) But if the words used reasonably have the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
