Appellant's sole contention is that claimant's refusal to submit to a myelogram test was unreasonable, and that claimant should be denied compensation by reason thereof. The board has found that claimant's refusal to undergo the test was reasonable. Most of the medical testimony is to the effect that the test is not harmful or injurious, is necessary for proper diagnoses, and that claimant's refusal is unreasonable. However, there is medical testimony to the contrary, with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
