Per Curiam.
The record is without any proof that defendant's [respondent's] employee, an unidentified person, was authorized to use the assistance of anyone else, or that such authority may be implied from the duties to be performed. Although plaintiff [infant] had examined defendant before trial, the examination was not used on the trial. Consequently, there was no proof of the duties or responsibilities of the employee, never identified, let alone of any...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
