Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and new hearing directed, with costs to abide the event.
The Surrogate erroneously held as a matter of law that the evidence as to alleged misrepresentations by the attorney for the petitioner could not be considered in determining whether the general releases should be set aside. (Pimpinello v. Swift & Co., 253 N.Y. 159; 5 Williston on Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 1488.) The Surrogate could have disbelieved...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
