Appellant was convicted on October 17, 1938, of the crime of robbery in the first degree. In this proceeding he contended, inter alia, that upon his trial he had been denied the right to defend in person and was compelled against his will to proceed with an inexperienced attorney, assigned by the court, who was unfamiliar with the facts in his case. In denying appellant's motion the learned County Judge found that the points raised thereon were known to appellant at...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
