Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
On the facts presented, the restrictions on the use of plaintiff's property, imposed by the 1927 ordinance and the 1952 amendment, were so unreasonable and arbitrary as to constitute a taking of plaintiff's property; and the zoning ordinance and the amendment were properly held unconstitutional and void insofar as they affected plaintiff's premises. (Rockdale Constr. Corp. v. Incorporated Vil. of Cedarhurst,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.