PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that the judgment of the court below should be reversed, asserting that no actionable negligence was shown on its part which was the proximate cause of the accident, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, that the evidence as to the impaired physical condition of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the verdict was excessive. Every contention made is fully answered by the opinion of Judge Stewart. See
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.