1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 201 F.2d
  5. 201 F.2d 890 (1953)
 

ACKERMAN v. HOOK

No. 10860.

201 F.2d 890 (1953)

Harold S. ACKERMAN v. C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance, R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 6, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Price, New York City (Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman.

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller, and for R. O. Graffius.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case will be affirmed for the reasons set out by Judge Kirkpatrick in his opinion in that court, 109 F.Supp. 933

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases