Per Curiam.
The complaint in this action for the purchase price of a laundering machine is bottomed upon an order signed by the defendant but providing that it should not be binding on the plaintiff "until accepted by it in writing". The date of the order was July 13, 1950, and the uncontradicted testimony shows that on July 15, 1950, defendant advised plaintiff's salesman to hold up on the order. The salesman was not called to contradict this. While the order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
