DE TRAGLIA v. NATONAL BANK OF HOBART


281 A.D. 802 (1953)

Joseph A. De Traglia, Doing Business as Joseph Trill, Appellant, v. Natonal Bank of Hobart et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

January 16, 1953.


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

WHEELER, J. (dissenting).

Although defendants-respondents' motion to dismiss the complaint was made upon affidavits, apparently under subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the order appealed from grants the motion on the sole ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, necessarily under rule 106. Upon a motion under the latter rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases