GOLDSTEIN v. BROCKSTEIN


281 A.D. 762 (1953)

Miriam Goldstein et al., Appellants, v. Nathan Brockstein et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 19, 1953.


The complaint sufficiently alleges the creation of an express parol trust (Foreman v. Foreman, 251 N.Y. 237; McKenna v. Meehan, 248 N.Y. 206; Wnuk v. Wnuk, 95 N.Y.S.2d 254, affd. 276 App. Div. 1102) as to which the provision in subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law, as well as section 242 of the Real Property Law, is inapplicable (Blanco v. Velez, 295 N.Y. 224). It is alleged in the complaint that the grandmother of the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases