1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 262 P.2d
  5. 262 P.2d 779 (1953)
 

STATE v. ROGERS

No. 5715.

262 P.2d 779 (1953)

57 N.M. 686

STATE ex rel. PRINCE v. ROGERS.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

October 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H.A. Kiker, Joseph M. Montoya, Edwin L. Felter, Santa Fe, for relator.

Richard H. Robinson, Atty. Gen., Walter R. Kegel and Fred M. Standley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. The question is whether a district attorney is amenable to the removal provisions of Ch. 36, Laws 1909, § 10-303, 1941 Comp. annotated, which reads:

"Any county, precinct, district, city, town or village officer elected by the people, and any officer appointed to fill out the unexpired term of any such officer, may be removed from office on any of the grounds mentioned in this chapter and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases