1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 201 F.2d
  5. 201 F.2d 824 (1953)
 

TEXAS-MILLER HAT CORP. v. SWITZER BROS.

No. 13915.

201 F.2d 824 (1953)

TEXAS-MILLER HAT CORP. et al. v. SWITZER BROS., Inc., et al. SWITZER BROS., Inc. et al. v. TEXAS-MILLER HAT CORP. et al.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Finnegan, Jr., Morgan, Finnegan & Durham, New York City, James J. Laney and Locke, Locke & Purnell, Dallas, Tex., for appellant and cross-appellees.

Albert L. Ely, Jr., Ely, Frye & Hamilton, Cleveland, Ohio, Carlisle Blalock, of Carrington, Gowan, Johnson & Walker, Dallas, Tex., for appellee and cross-appellants.

Before HOLMES, RUSSELL, and STRUM, Circuit Judges.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This suit for damages, for an accounting, and an injunction, was instituted by the Switzers in August, 1951, under the Patent Laws of the United States, Section 1338, Title 28 U.S.C., against various customers of Arthur Kahn, Inc. It alleged infringement of two patents owned by Switzer, each relating to articles dyed with fluorescent dyes; one, the Switzer patent, being entitled "Daylight Flourescent Signalling and Display Devices," the other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases