JEWEL TEA CO. v. BD. OF PHARMACY

Docket Nos. 13, 14, Calendar Nos. 45,372, 45,373.

335 Mich. 673 (1953)

57 N.W.2d 425

JEWEL TEA COMPANY, INC., v. BOARD OF PHARMACY. COOK COFFEE COMPANY v. SAME.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided March 10, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Youngjohn, Worley, Brown & Flynn (John W. Unger, of counsel), for plaintiff Jewel Tea Company and another.

Friedman, Meyers & Keys (Sylvan Rapaport and Maxwell E. Katzen, of counsel), for plaintiff Cook Coffee Company and another.

Frank G. Millard, Attorney General, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O'Hara and Ernest O. Zirkalos, Assistants Attorney General, for defendants.


BUSHNELL, J.

These cases, involving similar issues, were tried together and consolidated on appeal. The principal issue is the applicability of PA 1923, No 85, as amended (CL 1948, § 446.301 et seq. [Stat Ann § 19.611 et seq.]). If the act is applicable, the secondary questions are whether it contravenes certain sections of the Constitution of the State of Michigan and is contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases