BARDONEK v. STANLEY BARDONEK, INC.


282 A.D. 725 (1953)

Marie Bardonek, Appellant, v. Stanley Bardonek, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 22, 1953.


Order affirmed, without costs.

The notice of appeal to the County Court demanded a trial de novo in compliance with section 442 of the Justice Court Act. Thereafter the action was at issue in the County Court (Justice Ct. Act, § 446). Either party could have placed the case on the calendar for trial (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 150). Appellant did not do so. Therefore, there was not an abuse of discretion in the denial of appellant's motion because the respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases