SILKEN v. FARRELL


281 A.D. 718 (1952)

Maurice Silken, Respondent, v. Mary T. Farrell, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 29, 1952.


As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to the defendant. Findings of fact implicit in the verdict of the jury are affirmed.

In accordance with the express language of the pertinent provision of the lease and the prevailing authority (Meyer v. Schulte, 160 App. Div. 236, affd. 213 N.Y. 675; Baitzel v. Rhinelander, 179 App. Div. 735, 740-741) the plaintiff could not recover in this action unless as a condition precedent he proved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases