1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 108 Cal.App.2d
  5. 108 Cal.App.2d 856 (1952)
 

NANNY v. RUBY LIGHTING CORP.

Docket No. 14785.

108 Cal.App.2d 856 (1952)

239 P.2d 885

W.C. NANNY, Appellant, v. THE RUBY LIGHTING CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 29, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mueller & McLeod for Appellant.

Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel, Harold A. Block, Knight, Gitelson, Ashton & Hagenbaugh and Alfred Gitelson for Respondent.

PETERS, P.J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for change of venue.

The action was filed in San Francisco. The complaint fails to state the principal or any place of business of the corporate defendant, and fails to allege where the contract was made, where it was to be performed, where the obligation or liability arose, or where the breach occurred. If the defendant's principal place of business was other than San Francisco, it is quite apparent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases