1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 40 Wn.2d
  5. 40 Wn.2d 919 (1952)
 

MULKA v. KEYES

No. 32092.

40 Wn.2d 919 (1952)

246 P.2d 834

VICTOR R. MULKA et al., Appellants, v. ROSWELL P. KEYES et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

August 4, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Forrest & Rowles, for appellants.

Eggerman, Rosling & Williams, for respondents.

HAMLEY, J.

Howard C. Keyes, one of the respondents on this appeal, has moved that the appeal be dismissed as to him. His motion is based upon two grounds, the first being that there is no effective appeal bond now on file as to him.

During the course of the trial, Howard C. Keyes was dismissed as a party defendant by judgment of dismissal entered November 29, 1951. On December 27, 1951, appellants served their notice of appeal, and filed it on the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases