1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 105 F.Supp.
  5. 105 F.Supp. 841 (1952)
 

SWITZER v. MARZALL

No. 3919-50.

105 F.Supp. 841 (1952)

SWITZER et al. v. MARZALL, Commissioner of Patents.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 21, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ely & Frye, Cleveland, Ohio, and Bacon & Thomas, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

E. L. Reynolds, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

WILKIN, District Judge (Sitting by designation.)

This action was brought under Section 4915, Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The Complaint referred to Claims 1 to 18 of the plaintiffs' Application, Serial No. 455610, and in the words of the statute, asked the Court to adjudge that such applicants are entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for their invention, as specified in their claims or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases