1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 86 A.2d
  5. 86 A.2d 857 (1952)
 

MUIR v. MUIR

Civ. A. 328.

86 A.2d 857 (1952)

MUIR v. MUIR.

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex.

February 20, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Layton, Jr., of Georgetown, for the plaintiff.

Max Terry, of Dover, for the defendant.

HERRMANN, Judge.

This is an action for divorce on the ground of habitual drunkenness. The evidence shows conclusively that the defendant has been guilty of habitual drunkenness for a period of two years prior to the filing of the complaint.

The defendant attempts to invoke the provisions of 1935 Code 3501: "No decree for divorce shall be granted, if it appears to the satisfaction of the Court * * * that the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases