THOMAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks recovery of $8,095.64, alleging overpayment for water furnished under contract by defendant to plaintiff.
The only question of fact before the court is: Was the defendant paid for more water than the plaintiff actually consumed? If it was, the decision must then turn on questions of law involving the interpretation of the contract and the amendment thereto terminating the service.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
