CHARLES v. UMENTUM


261 Wis. 647 (1952)

CHARLES, Respondent, vs. UMENTUM and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 3, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Martin, Clifford, Warne, Duffy & Dewane of Green Bay, and oral argument by Lloyd O. Warne.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kehoe & Flatley of Green Bay, and oral argument by Robert H. Flatley.


MARTIN, J.

Some attempt was made by the defendants to make it appear that plaintiff was retained by Blahnik and was to be paid by him. However, the court's finding of fact that the defendants hired plaintiff is amply supported by the evidence. There is likewise adequate support for the finding that the rate agreed upon between the parties was $4.50 per foot drilled.

We do not agree with Finding 6 of the trial court that the plaintiff cannot recover for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases