ANGE v. ANGE

No. 98.

71 S.E.2d 19 (1952)

235 N.C. 506

ANGE et al. v. ANGE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Supplemental Opinion June 11, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. H. Manning, Williamston, for defendant appellant.

Peel & Peel, Williamston, for plaintiff appellees.


VALENTINE, Justice.

It will be noted at the outset that the judgment rendered was in favor of the defendant and did not adversely affect any substantial right of his. Therefore, he was not the proper party to appeal from the judgment. Hence, the appeal is subject to dismissal. Even so, the proceeding is in rem and the judgment entered in the court below vitally affects the title to real property. For that reason we take jurisdiction for the purpose of correcting the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases