RODGERS v. RODGERS


304 N.Y. 591 (1952)

Mary-Alice Rodgers, Appellant and Respondent, v. William H. Rodgers, Respondent and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 29, 1952


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Hinds for motion and in opposition to cross motion.

Maurice R. Whitebook for cross motion and in opposition to motion.


Motion by defendant granted, and plaintiff's appeal in its entirety dismissed upon the ground that a stipulation for judgment absolute cannot be given in this action for a separation since a counterclaim for annulment remains untried. (Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N.Y. 150.)

Cross motion by plaintiff granted and defendant's appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. [See...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases