Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
VAN VALKENBURGH v. LUTZ
304 N.Y. 590 (1952)
Marion L. Van Valkenburgh, Plaintiff, and Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, Appellant, v. Mary Lutz, Individually and as Executrix of William Lutz, Deceased, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted May 19, 1952.
Decided May 29, 1952
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.