1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 68 S.E.2d
  5. 68 S.E.2d 783 (1952)
 

TODD v. SMATHERS

No. 749.

68 S.E.2d 783 (1952)

235 N.C. 123

TODD v. SMATHERS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred S. Hutchins, Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ratcliff, Vaughn, Hudson, Ferrell & Carter, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A motion for continuance is addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, and, in the absence of manifest abuse, his ruling thereon is not reviewable. State v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236, 66 S.E.2d 907, and cases cited.

And on the facts presented on this record, we are of opinion that no such abuse has been made to appear. Hence this appeal will be, and it is hereby

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases