1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 262 Wis.
  5. 262 Wis. 586 (1952)
 

C. F. TRANTOW CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

262 Wis. 586 (1952)

C. F. TRANTOW COMPANY and another, Appellants, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 2, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Grelle & Schlotthauer, and oral argument by John F. Jenswold, all of Madison.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent Margaret Suhr there was a oral argument by Donald E. Reiland of Wisconsin Rapids.

FAIRCHILD, J.

The court below was convinced that the commission acted within its jurisdiction in entering the order of September 5, 1950. The decision, as far as the jurisdictional question is concerned, follows the statutes. Sec. 102.16 (1), Stats. 1949, provides:

"Any controversy concerning compensation, including any in which the state may be a party, shall be submitted to said commission in the manner and with the effect provided in this chapter. Every...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases