KAISER-FRAZER CORP. v. EATON

Civil Action No. 646, 1951.

85 A.2d 752 (1952)

KAISER-FRAZER CORP. v. EATON et al.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle.

January 3, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Samuel Arsht (of Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht), of Wilmington, for plaintiff.

William Prickett, of Wilmington, appearing specially for defendant William R. Daley.

John J. Morris, Jr. (of Hering, Morris, James & Hitchens), of Wilmington, appearing specially for defendant Cyrus S. Eaton.


HERRMANN, Judge.

The pending motions present two ultimate questions for decision:

1. Where there is a valid attachment of some property of the defendant in an action begun by writ of foreign attachment, will the effectiveness of a garnishment of other property, rights or credits of the defendant be determined upon motion made under special appearance for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction of the Court?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases