1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 249 S.W.2d
  5. 249 S.W.2d 587 (1952)
 

MATLOCK v. MATLOCK

No. A-3516.

249 S.W.2d 587 (1952)

MATLOCK v. MATLOCK.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Senterfitt, Crump & Jameson, San Saba, Hammett & Lynch, Lampasas, for petitioner.

S. W. Hughes and Newman & McCollum, all of Brady, Woodruff & Holloway, Brownwood, Dan Moody, Austin (in Supreme Court only) for respondent.

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

The sole question for decision in this case is the right of petitioner to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed on certificate. The transcript and statement of facts were tendered to the Clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals for filing on June 20, 1951, and at the same time appellant (respondent here) filed a motion for leave to file them. The sixty-day period after the overruling of a motion for a new trial in the district court expired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases