STATE v. TYNDALL

No. 361.

72 S.E.2d 742 (1952)

236 N.C. 365

STATE v. TYNDALL.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 29, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Frank Wooten and John G. Dawson, Kinston, for defendant, appellant.

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., Claude L. Love, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert L. Emanuel, Member of Staff, Raleigh, for the State.


DENNY, Justice.

The appellant makes no contention that the evidence offered in the trial below was insufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict rendered. He seeks a new trial bottomed solely upon an incident that occurred while the solicitor was arguing the case to the jury.

The State offered evidence to the effect that on Sunday morning, 13 January, 1952, between 8:30 and 9:00 o'clock, two members of the Police Department of the City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases