1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 260 Wis.
  5. 260 Wis. 541 (1952)
 

SCHULZ v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. R. CO.

260 Wis. 541 (1952)

SCHULZ, Respondent, vs. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Bender, Trump, McIntyre, Trimborn & Godfrey, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.

For the respondent there was a brief by Curran & Curran of Mauston, and oral argument by Charles P. Curran and Thomas J. Curran.

BROWN, J.

Sec. 192.29 (5), Stats., directs the warning which must be placed at every railway-highway crossing.

"Danger Signs. Every railroad corporation shall maintain wherever its track crosses a public highway or street and near such crossing a large signboard with the following inscription, painted in large letters on each side: `Look Out For Cars,' in such manner as to be visible on the highway or street at least a hundred feet distant on each side...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases