1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 109 F.Supp.
  5. 109 F.Supp. 652 (1952)
 

CONSOLIDATED CAR HEAT. CO. v. CHROME-GOLD ALLOYS CORP.

Civ. No. 3841.

109 F.Supp. 652 (1952)

CONSOLIDATED CAR HEATING CO., Inc. v. CHROME-GOLD ALLOYS CORP. et al.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

Decided December 2, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andros & Smith, Albany, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Wiswall, Wood, Olson & Schoonmaker, Albany, N. Y. (Chester Wood, Albany, N. Y., and Karl W. Flocks, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendants.

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

This is the usual patent infringement action with the usual prayer for relief.

The answer denies the validity and infringement of the patent in suit. The answer of Chrome-Gold Alloys Sales, Inc., also alleges as a counterclaim a cause of action against the plaintiff based upon unfair competition, which is denied in plaintiff's reply. No evidence was offered on the trial to support the allegations of the counterclaim. It is deemed abandoned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases