ROSE v. ROSE


3 Misc.2d 753 (1952)

Eleanor H. Rose, Plaintiff, v. Billy Rose, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

Motion for Reargument November 3, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis Nizer and Walter S. Beck for plaintiff.

Arthur Garfield Hays and Harold Epstein for defendant.


JAMES B. M. McNALLY, J.

Plaintiff moves for an examination of the defendant as to his income, earnings and property and the defendant's living expenses. The plaintiff has been awarded a separation and the issue remaining to be determined is the extent of the defendant's obligation to support the plaintiff. Although a plaintiff in an action for separation may not examine a defendant as to his economic condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases