MAHRLE v. ENGLE


261 Wis. 485 (1952)

MAHRLE, Respondent, vs. ENGLE, Executrix, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Morris Karon and Karon & Weinberg, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Morris Karon.

Will C. Gobel of Milwaukee, for the respondent.


BROWN, J.

In his oral argument, though not in his brief, respondent contended that the order in question is not an appealable one. We think he is mistaken. Garnishment before execution issued is a provisional remedy. Revisor's note, 1878, to ch. 267, Stats., Wis. Anno. (1950). The order refusing to dismiss the garnishment was one which continued it and therefore continued a provisional remedy. An order which continues a provisional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases