BADHAM v. ALEXANDER

No. 11447.

194 F.2d 535 (1952)

Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 20, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond C. Stephenson and Hottell, Stephenson & Allen, all of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

Garland R. Hubbard, Louisville, Ky., and James W. Aird, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or in respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,

The judgment below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases