STUFFLEBEME v. JACK

No. 10092.

253 S.W.2d 459 (1952)

STUFFLEBEME et al. v. JACK.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Rehearing Denied December 17, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burford, Ryburn, Hincks & Ford, Sam P. Burford by Roy L. Cole, all of Dallas, for appellants.

Chas. Romick, Dallas, for appellee.


HUGHES, Justice.

H. S. Jack, Sr., appellee, doing business under the name of Dayton Pop-up Sprinkling Systems of Dallas, sued appellants, B. A. and L. Sidney Stufflebeme, for breach of a written contract to pay appellee for repairs made by him on sprinkling systems installed by appellants in Dallas. The form of the suit was in the nature of a suit upon a sworn account. When all the evidence was in the trial court, at appellee's request, instructed the jury to return...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases