ACHILLES v. HOOPES

No. 32011.

40 Wn.2d 664 (1952)

245 P.2d 1005

ARTHUR F. ACHILLES, Appellant, v. ARTHUR E. HOOPES, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

June 19, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warner, Pierce & Peden, for appellant.

John W. Brisky, for respondents.


OLSON, J.

The question presented by this case is whether the community or separate character of a promissory note, executed by the husband alone, is determined by the law of the place where it was made or by the law of the place where it was payable.

The defendants are husband and wife and have been such at all times material to this case. In 1948, their family home was in Seattle, Washington. During June of that year, defendant husband went to Coos Bay, Oregon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases