1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 261 Wis.
  5. 261 Wis. 442 (1952)
 

DOERING v. KNUDSEN

261 Wis. 442 (1952)

DOERING and another, Respondents, vs. KNUDSEN and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Smith, Okoneski, Puchner & Tinkham of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham.

For the respondents there was a brief by Schmitt, Eckhardt & Gullickson of Merrill, and oral argument by A. G. Eckhardt.

GEHL, J.

Defendants contend that the award is excessive, the result, in part at least, of improper remarks made by plaintiffs' counsel in his argument to the jury. They may not complain on that account for they made no objection to counsel's argument as it was being made.

"Such course of objecting to improper remarks so that an immediate ruling by the court and the admonishing of counsel may avoid injurious consequences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases