1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 193 Or.
  5. 193 Or. 509 (1952)
 

MEADS v. STOTT

193 Or. 509 (1952)

238 P.2d 256

239 P.2d 594

MEADS v. STOTT

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions December 5, 1951.

Petition for rehearing denied January 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

U.S. Balentine, of Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Mark Simons, of Klamath Falls.

R.B. Maxwell argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Farrens & Maxwell, and W.J. Moshofsky, all of Klamath Falls.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, ROSSMAN, LUSK and TOOZE, Justices.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

TOOZE, J.

This is a suit by Frank R. Meads, as plaintiff, against Manning C. Stott, as defendant, for the dissolution of an alleged partnership and for an accounting.

Plaintiff, by his complaint, alleges that during the months of November and December, 1944, he and defendant entered into a copartnership agreement for the conduct of a general outdoor advertising business, to begin January 2, 1945; that said business was conducted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases