1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 194 Or.
  5. 194 Or. 507 (1952)
 

PERRIGO ET AL. v. BOEHM ET AL.

194 Or. 507 (1952)

242 P.2d 791

PERRIGO ET AL. v. BOEHM ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded with directions April 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M.E. Reynolds, of Astoria, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was A.C. Fulton, of Astoria.

John R. Latourette, Jr. of Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief was Cecil C. Wright, of Seaside.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, ROSSMAN, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

HAY, J.

The plaintiffs, T.W. Perrigo, F.B. Perrigo and Lawrence Perrigo, commenced this proceeding as an action at law to recover damages for alleged fraud and deceit.

In the year 1946, Jed and Vera Wilson, husband and wife, were the owners of a tract of land at Seaside, Oregon, lying easterly of and being partly bounded by the right of way of the Spokane, Portland and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases