MARY MUFFET v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

No. 68, Docket 21976.

194 F.2d 504 (1952)

MARY MUFFET, Inc., et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided February 7, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Sonnenreich, New York City, for petitioners.

Alan B. Hobbes, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, of Washington, D. C. (W. T. Kelley, Gen. Counsel, and James W. Cassedy, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

On substantial evidence the Commission found that ladies purchasing dresses preferred silk and were not able or found it difficult to distinguish rayon therefrom. This justified the Commission in finding the public interest involved to prevent the resulting misleading possible in the sale of dress goods and in ordering petitioners, manufacturers of women's clothing, to label their rayon products as rayon, thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases