1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 280 A.D.
  5. 280 A.D. 401 (1952)
 

SCHULMAN v. ROYAL IND. BANK

280 A.D. 401 (1952)

Ernest Schulman, Respondent, v. Royal Industrial Bank et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 17, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George R. Spitz of counsel (Coleman Gangel and Benjamin J. Jacobson with him on the brief; Max M. Littman, attorney), for appellants.

Emil K. Ellis of counsel (Jonas Ellis and Abraham J. Heller with him on the brief; Emil K. Ellis, attorney), for respondent.

COHN, J. P., VAN VOORHIS, HEFFERNAN and BERGAN, JJ., concur.

CALLAHAN, J.

This appeal presents the question as to the sufficiency of the third cause of action in a complaint by one claiming to have acted as broker in the sale of certain bank stock. Apparently the stock of defendant Royal Industrial Bank (hereinafter called "Royal") has been purchased by defendant Bronx Credit Union (hereinafter called "Union"). The plaintiff claims that he, through defendant Barber, interested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases