CITY OF WATERTOWN v. TOWN OF WATERTOWN


207 Misc. 433 (1952)

City of Watertown, Plaintiff, v. Town of Watertown, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Jefferson County.

February 16, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunk, Conboy, McKay & Bachman for defendant.

Kenneth W. Brett for plaintiff.


BASTOW, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint pursuant to rule 106 upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In such circumstances the allegations of facts found in the complaint are treated as admitted by the defendant. (Kane v. Walsh, 295 N.Y. 198.)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases